- D-sfc-small.jpg

DT-2-Joseph-2

From Dunham-Singletary Family Connections
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|
 
|
  
2.  '''JOSEPH 2 DUNHAM''' (Joseph 1 Dunham) b. say 1725-1727, probably in Frederick Co., VA; [1] d. bef. 3 March 1761.  He m. abt. 1745 in Anson Co., NC. MARY CLAYPOOL, b. abt. 1730.
+
2.  '''JOSEPH 2 DUNHAM''' (Joseph 1 Dunham) b. say 1725-1727, probably in Frederick Co., VA; [1] d. bef. 3 March 1761.  He m. abt. 1745 in Anson Co., NC. '''MARY CLAYPOOL''', b. abt. 1730.
  
 
This Joseph 2 Dunham was a signer of the petition to annex the Watauga area to the Province of North Carolina in 1776.[2]  Joseph, Mary and Reuben Dunham’s names appear in the Washington Co. records.  <font color="#FF00FF">NOTE: Need to verify location of Watauga and Washington Co. STATE -- June 2018 JAS</font>
 
This Joseph 2 Dunham was a signer of the petition to annex the Watauga area to the Province of North Carolina in 1776.[2]  Joseph, Mary and Reuben Dunham’s names appear in the Washington Co. records.  <font color="#FF00FF">NOTE: Need to verify location of Watauga and Washington Co. STATE -- June 2018 JAS</font>
  
  
It is unclear just how the relationship of the Dunhams who were early settlers in Tennessee developed.  We know that there was a very close relationship because a descendant of John 2 Dunham and a descendant of the line from Joseph 2 Dunham have participated in DNA analysis.  A 25 marker DNA test taken by these two Dunham men show a match with a 1-step mutation in one marker.  Thus these two Dunham men were very closely related.
+
It is unclear just how the relationship of the Dunhams who were early settlers in Tennessee developed.  We know that there was a very close relationship because a descendant of John 2 Dunham and a descendant of the line from Joseph 2 Dunham have participated in DNA analysis.  A 25 marker DNA test taken by these two Dunham men show a match with a 1-step mutation in one marker.  Thus these two Dunham men were very closely related. <font color="#FF00FF">NOTE:  Add link to DNA info --  and added to references JAS</font> [3]
 +
 
  
  
Line 19: Line 20:
  
 
:::::        i.  MARY 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1746
 
:::::        i.  MARY 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1746
::::: 5.    ii.  REUBEN THADEUS 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1748         
+
::::: 5.    ii. '''[[DT-5-Reuben-3  | REUBEN THADEUS 3 DUNHAM]]''', b. say 1748         
::::: 6.  iii.  HENRY H. 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1750   
+
::::: 6.  iii. '''[[DT-6-Henry-3  | HENRY H. 3 DUNHAM]]''', b. say 1750   
 
::::: 7.    iv.  WILLIAM 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1752; d. 1811 n.f.r.
 
::::: 7.    iv.  WILLIAM 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1752; d. 1811 n.f.r.
::::: 8.    v.  JOSEPH 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1754
+
::::: 8.    v. '''[[DT-7-Joseph-3  | JOSEPH 3 DUNHAM]]''', b. say 1754
 
::::: 9.    vi.  DANIEL 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1757 n.f.r.
 
::::: 9.    vi.  DANIEL 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1757 n.f.r.
 
::::: 10.  vii.  JOHN 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1760
 
::::: 10.  vii.  JOHN 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1760
Line 29: Line 30:
 
----
 
----
  
References:
+
:::References:
 
+
1.  Research of descendant Bill Dunham.
+
2.  1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina.
+
  
 +
:::::1.  Research of descendant Bill Dunham.
 +
:::::2.  1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina.
 +
:::::3.  DSFC DNA Testing
  
 
|}
 
|}
Line 40: Line 41:
 
Comments to the [[mailto:genealogist@dunham-singletary.org Historian]]
 
Comments to the [[mailto:genealogist@dunham-singletary.org Historian]]
  
Return to: Return to: [[DT | Dunham Families of Tennessee]] or to the [DT-1-Joseph-1 | Prior Page ]]
+
Return to: Return to: [[DT | Dunham Families of Tennessee]] or to the [[DT-1-Joseph-1 | Prior Page ]]

Latest revision as of 15:01, 17 June 2018

DUNHAM FAMILIES of TENNESSEE

SECOND GENERATION IN AMERICA

2. JOSEPH 2 DUNHAM (Joseph 1 Dunham) b. say 1725-1727, probably in Frederick Co., VA; [1] d. bef. 3 March 1761. He m. abt. 1745 in Anson Co., NC. MARY CLAYPOOL, b. abt. 1730.

This Joseph 2 Dunham was a signer of the petition to annex the Watauga area to the Province of North Carolina in 1776.[2] Joseph, Mary and Reuben Dunham’s names appear in the Washington Co. records. NOTE: Need to verify location of Watauga and Washington Co. STATE -- June 2018 JAS


It is unclear just how the relationship of the Dunhams who were early settlers in Tennessee developed. We know that there was a very close relationship because a descendant of John 2 Dunham and a descendant of the line from Joseph 2 Dunham have participated in DNA analysis. A 25 marker DNA test taken by these two Dunham men show a match with a 1-step mutation in one marker. Thus these two Dunham men were very closely related. NOTE: Add link to DNA info -- and added to references JAS [3]



Children of Joseph 2 and Mary (Claypool) Dunham:
i. MARY 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1746
5. ii. REUBEN THADEUS 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1748
6. iii. HENRY H. 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1750
7. iv. WILLIAM 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1752; d. 1811 n.f.r.
8. v. JOSEPH 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1754
9. vi. DANIEL 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1757 n.f.r.
10. vii. JOHN 3 DUNHAM, b. say 1760



References:
1. Research of descendant Bill Dunham.
2. 1776 Petition of the Inhabitants of Washington District to the Provincial Congress of North Carolina.
3. DSFC DNA Testing

Copyright Notice.jpg Comments to the [Historian]

Return to: Return to: Dunham Families of Tennessee or to the Prior Page

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox